tullist
Master Craftsman
Posts: 478
|
Post by tullist on Feb 8, 2014 14:46:16 GMT
" Jethro Tull's Ian Anderson" or " Jethro Tull's Martin Barre" is fine by me and I dare say, many others. Both deserve to use the name for what they've contributed to the band over all these years. I wonder what would have happened if someone else used the name? Jethro Tull's Glenn Cornick, Jethro Tull's Clive Bunker, Jethro Tull's Mick Abrahams
All is well in my opinion which is what Chat Groups are all about. Until you cross an imaginary line. If you create your own name like Fresh Tull or Tull 2014 you somehow run the risk of offending someone.
The insults towards the current members are acceptable to some who wish to turn the clock back. Then the idea that you are dishonoring Martin Barre gets thrown in for emotional effect.
So being happy about this band creates anxiety amongst some fans who are still grieving over what happened in 2011. I cannot grieve for what Martin and Ian are doing now. I hope both are successful.
My respect continues for both. This ain't the Greatful Dead, Led Zeppelin, Yes, Pink Floyd, or the Beatles. This band, dare I say "Tull", was a constantly changing and evolving group designed by Ian Anderson. Let's Evolve Ian Anderson's Erraticus Band ? The Ian, Flo, David, John, Ryan, Scott Band?So incorrect. And this thread is starting to get me pissed off there Jim. Its done for one reason only, and you, Jim, keep trying to spin that $h1t back to where you had it last year. Listen pal, in a nutshell, do not get me angry. I should not have to return to adjust your recent colorization. Of course if people don't like it I will leave. But be VERY careful. These guys don't use it for one reason, and one damn reason ONLY. None of the mf's are famous enough to move product without it. In that respect very unlike th Who, Pink Floyd, Grateful Dead. The are closeer to something like Fairport or Steeleye. Yes they were famous for a minute 40 years ago. I mean honestly, are mf's thick. The question is not using it along with one's name, the question is calling themselves this AS THEIR NAME. You should be familiar with that notion Jim, as it appears to be a perversion of yours. Its not like these mf's are saying I'm Jethro Tull, no I'm Jethro Tull. I will have a sharp eye out for all responses. I do hope there are none. Cause I need to spit this taste out of my mouth. Real bad.
|
|
tullist
Master Craftsman
Posts: 478
|
Post by tullist on Feb 8, 2014 15:30:03 GMT
I wonder what would have happened if someone else used the name? Jethro Tull's Glenn Cornick, Jethro Tull's Clive Bunker, Jethro Tull's Mick Abrahams
All is well in my opinion which is what Chat Groups are all about. Until you cross an imaginary line. If you create your own name like Fresh Tull or Tull 2014 you somehow run the risk of offending someone.
The insults towards the current members are acceptable to some who wish to turn the clock back. Then the idea that you are dishonoring Martin Barre gets thrown in for emotional effect.
So being happy about this band creates anxiety amongst some fans who are still grieving over what happened in 2011. I cannot grieve for what Martin and Ian are doing now. I hope both are successful.
My respect continues for both. This ain't the Greatful Dead, Led Zeppelin, Yes, Pink Floyd, or the Beatles. This band, dare I say "Tull", was a constantly changing and evolving group designed by Ian Anderson. Let's Evolve Ian Anderson's Erraticus Band ? The Ian, Flo, David, John, Ryan, Scott Band? So incorrect. And this thread is starting to get me pissed off there Jim. Its done for one reason only, and you, Jim, keep trying to spin that $h1t back to where you had it last year. Listen pal, in a nutshell, do not get me angry. I should not have to return to adjust your recent colorization. Of course if people don't like it I will leave. But be VERY careful. These guys don't use it for one reason, and one damn reason ONLY. None of the mf's are famous enough to move product without it. In that respect very unlike th Who, Pink Floyd, Grateful Dead. The are closeer to something like Fairport or Steeleye. Yes they were famous for a minute 40 years ago. I mean honestly, are mf's thick. The question is not using it along with one's name, the question is calling themselves this AS THEIR NAME. You should be familiar with that notion Jim, as it appears to be a perversion of yours. Its not like these mf's are saying I'm Jethro Tull, no I'm Jethro Tull. I will have a sharp eye out for all responses. I do hope there are none. Cause I need to spit this taste out of my mouth. Real bad. Go ahead Jim/Equus, open your fricking mouth. I dare you. Or do regale with tales of having seen Black Oak Arkansas. My god what a putrid list of performers u have seen. Had a brief fling with the Dead did you? My fricking arse. Believe me if that light had got shined on you you would be a new man. You heard jack $h1t thru your classic rock radio. VERY careful where you tread. In the meantime to the coterie of buttsniffers over on the other board, ya'll can jack it right up your arse too, maybe use one of those hot dogs. Believe me there is not the first of you mf's I would not tell it to your face.
|
|
tullist
Master Craftsman
Posts: 478
|
Post by tullist on Feb 8, 2014 15:37:42 GMT
So incorrect. And this thread is starting to get me pissed off there Jim. Its done for one reason only, and you, Jim, keep trying to spin that $h1t back to where you had it last year. Listen pal, in a nutshell, do not get me angry. I should not have to return to adjust your recent colorization. Of course if people don't like it I will leave. But be VERY careful. These guys don't use it for one reason, and one damn reason ONLY. None of the mf's are famous enough to move product without it. In that respect very unlike th Who, Pink Floyd, Grateful Dead. The are closeer to something like Fairport or Steeleye. Yes they were famous for a minute 40 years ago. I mean honestly, are mf's thick. The question is not using it along with one's name, the question is calling themselves this AS THEIR NAME. You should be familiar with that notion Jim, as it appears to be a perversion of yours. Its not like these mf's are saying I'm Jethro Tull, no I'm Jethro Tull. I will have a sharp eye out for all responses. I do hope there are none. Cause I need to spit this taste out of my mouth. Real bad. Go ahead Jim/Equus, open your fricking mouth. I dare you. Or do regale with tales of having seen Black Oak Arkansas. My god what a putrid list of performers u have seen. Had a brief fling with the Dead did you? My fricking arse. Believe me if that light had got shined on you you would be a new man. You heard jack $h1t thru your classic rock radio. VERY careful where you tread. In the meantime to the coterie of buttsniffers over on the other board, ya'll can jack it right up your arse too, maybe use one of those hot dogs. Believe me there is not the first of you mf's I would not tell it to your face. So fricking sick of TULL PERVERTS, not Tull fans. And as regards that other board, it was of course born out of one of them not being able to deal with the fact that their installment tale was some boring ass $h1t, I ain't laughin at some $h1t that ain't funny. You're a moron. I can't help it. Go get lost in prog wonderland, maybe with some sex toys accoutrements to keep u entertained. Tell me again how good the War Child band is, I got a bit more wretch I need to vomit up. Or the undeniable excellence of grainy 1974 footage. Get a motherf**king life. Oops, a little late for that. Learn some humility before you meet your maker, because bitch, u gonna dance.
|
|
tullist
Master Craftsman
Posts: 478
|
Post by tullist on Feb 8, 2014 16:43:27 GMT
All you get your back hairs down or you WILL be locked in a room with Bread ( the band) and water. and a random FATMAN. Everyone is entitled to their opinions...even if they disagree with ME. I'm too busy at work today sorting out certified mentally ill people to sort out you street ready nutjobs in our Tull club. This would be easily worked out over a few beers, a neutral Tull era CD of Ian playing at some violin ladies feet and a group hug with or without weekend beards....... not by me they wouldn't. The hard fact is there is a considerable amount of Tull's fan base I do not like. No beers will be quenching that. Basically you are a man of honest character, or you are my enemy. There is no neutral ground. And I am going to start calling that $h1t out on a regular basis. Me and the Fat man in the same room eh, somebody is gonna get hurt, maybe me. Better make sure I'm dead. Believe me he would learn respect. And very possibly end up with his dancing hot dogs jammed in his arse and mouth. With the Passion Play cover over his head. Basically I ain't afraid to die, got all the good years in. But I would love to take down the third rate mf's peopling Tull land with me. I really don't think you wanna know about my kind of crazy, its pretty focused. And I know all I need to know about asylum's and our countries treatment of the mentally ill, my older, and quite violent brother has been institutionalized for over 40 years, with what my late Mother was told was the most advanced case of schizophrenia they had ever seen. believe me I fricking know. Probably been looking for mf's to take it out on from having grown up with that $h1t. Rank cowards peopling Tull land. Literally cannot stand alot of these mf's. Most, but not all, with a usa address. Do not ever tell me to rock on, keep that $h1t off my Tull page. Believe me I remember you joining in on the dancing hot dog dance. Careful where you fricking tread.
|
|
|
Post by maddogfagin on Feb 8, 2014 17:19:58 GMT
OK guys calm down please
The rumours from elsewhere are their concern and not ours. If they wish to stir things up then that's their problem and of no concern of ours. If they wish to accuse members here of having double identities then so be it - this is a site about Jethro Tull and all its various component parts and not a place to bitch about what other people do, and if they wish to waste their time then let them.
And talking of multiple identities, in the last couple of weeks one new member has joined here but rather foolishly used the exact same email address of a known troll who goes by the name of tommie aka Tom Giarmo aka ccola aka ryanwhite ad nauseam, a person who is well known and encouraged by those who are now attempting to mess up the smooth running of the Forum. Coincidence, I think not.
For the record, jtul007's IP address locates him at North Carolina and Equus' IP address is from Denmark.
Whilst I realise that proxy IP addresses can be used, jtul007 and Equus apparently shared an image which is why the accusation is now rife that they are both the same person. Equus sent me the self same a few weeks ago image and it has no connection with jtul007.
|
|
tullist
Master Craftsman
Posts: 478
|
Post by tullist on Feb 8, 2014 17:32:33 GMT
OK guys calm down please The rumours from elsewhere are their concern and not ours. If they wish to stir things up then that's their problem and of no concern of ours. If they wish to accuse members here of having double identities then so be it - this is a site about Jethro Tull and all its various component parts and not a place to bitch about what other people do, and if they wish to waste their time then let them. And talking of multiple identities, in the last couple of weeks one new member has joined here but rather foolishly used the exact same email address of a known troll who goes by the name of tommie aka Tom Giarmo aka ccola aka ryanwhite ad nauseam, a person who is well known and encouraged by those who are now attempting to mess up the smooth running of the Forum. Coincidence, I think not. For the record, jtul007's IP address locates him at North Carolina and Equus' IP address is from Denmark. Whilst I realise that proxy IP addresses can be used, jtul007 and Equus apparently shared an image which is why the accusation is now rife that they are both the same person. Equus sent me the self same a few weeks ago image and it has no connection with jtul007. Ok, out of respect to Graham I will calm down. And thank you for calling out Tommie, NY Tulltwit 1, a rank pervert, though god knows he has alot of challengers. At least he is entertaining, though that is not his intent.
|
|
tullist
Master Craftsman
Posts: 478
|
Post by tullist on Feb 8, 2014 23:24:53 GMT
At this point I will be taking one of my occasional leaves. Unlike other times, I will not be discontinuing the account. Go ahead Jim, try and pervert the name of or have the last word on the damn name, and believe me I will strike. Your perversion of same on the other board will not and has not been forgotten by me, i know when a man has an agenda. Nor the dancing hot dogs and your glad participation in same. And I will rise to slam down any inaccuracies. In the meantime you just go on calling people Sir Martin or Sir Florian, there is a level of geekery at which I can no longer be a party to it. Yeah. Go Jim Dandy Go. Rock on. Maybe get yourself a heapin helpin of some Guess Who, Rare Earth or Black Oak Arkansas and have yourself a swell time.
|
|
tullist
Master Craftsman
Posts: 478
|
Post by tullist on Feb 9, 2014 15:47:53 GMT
Jim, this is a thread celebrating and discussing the announcement of a new album and a recently confirmed album cover--this is exciting for all Tull fans--nobody wants to hear about your year-old grudges in the midst of it. Tullist, for god's if you want to rant at Jim keep it to PMs, don't hijack a perfectly good thread, and stop trying to intimidate and threaten people over the internet, it makes it hard to take you seriously, and it makes crappy conversation. Seriously guys, please stop or keep it to PMs Volcanoes or towns burning down. Or tarsands train derailments exploding, got lots of those going on. I saw on a Facebook Tull update that for sure that's the album cover. Good choice. How will it tie into the songs? This, for the St. Cleve Chronicle, became the question. Perhaps this album will have a touch of the moody pessimism some of the 1970/80s Tull releases had. Perhaps all this time we were chatting about TAAB3 or Passion Play 2, and Ian brews up a sequel to Stormwatch--post apocalypse--after the Dark Ages... Either way, when Ian Anderson releases an album, all Tull fans win. Journey man. or whatever your name is out where men address each other face to face. firstly, take your suburban white man black oak arkansas and probably rush and elp loving ass out of my sight. never deign to presume to address me in any manner of ethic. f**k you. make sure you do not respond to this and retire to your corner because if my rage is something you wish to engage i assure u i can make this quite a miserable place. in my absence you make god damn sure my name is respected. i aints asking you. i am telling you. go ahead. f**k with me. get out of my sight
|
|
tullist
Master Craftsman
Posts: 478
|
Post by tullist on Feb 9, 2014 15:57:18 GMT
Jim, this is a thread celebrating and discussing the announcement of a new album and a recently confirmed album cover--this is exciting for all Tull fans--nobody wants to hear about your year-old grudges in the midst of it. Tullist, for god's if you want to rant at Jim keep it to PMs, don't hijack a perfectly good thread, and stop trying to intimidate and threaten people over the internet, it makes it hard to take you seriously, and it makes crappy conversation. Seriously guys, please stop or keep it to PMs Volcanoes or towns burning down. Or tarsands train derailments exploding, got lots of those going on. I saw on a Facebook Tull update that for sure that's the album cover. Good choice. How will it tie into the songs? This, for the St. Cleve Chronicle, became the question. Perhaps this album will have a touch of the moody pessimism some of the 1970/80s Tull releases had. Perhaps all this time we were chatting about TAAB3 or Passion Play 2, and Ian brews up a sequel to Stormwatch--post apocalypse--after the Dark Ages... Either way, when Ian Anderson releases an album, all Tull fans win. I very definitely DO NOT need the come uppance from someone I do not know from f**king Adam. Take your doubtlessly well intended advice and jack it up your ass. believe me. i know my manners. sometimes there is a bad dog that needs to be put down. it what i do. that dog will know silence and know never to address me or i will make him my personal vindictive project. never question my methods. i am not looking for your approval. believe me i do not need it.
|
|
tullist
Master Craftsman
Posts: 478
|
Post by tullist on Feb 9, 2014 15:59:45 GMT
Jim, this is a thread celebrating and discussing the announcement of a new album and a recently confirmed album cover--this is exciting for all Tull fans--nobody wants to hear about your year-old grudges in the midst of it. Tullist, for god's if you want to rant at Jim keep it to PMs, don't hijack a perfectly good thread, and stop trying to intimidate and threaten people over the internet, it makes it hard to take you seriously, and it makes crappy conversation. Seriously guys, please stop or keep it to PMs Perhaps this album will have a touch of the moody pessimism some of the 1970/80s Tull releases had. Perhaps all this time we were chatting about TAAB3 or Passion Play 2, and Ian brews up a sequel to Stormwatch--post apocalypse--after the Dark Ages... Either way, when Ian Anderson releases an album, all Tull fans win. I very definitely DO NOT need the come uppance from someone I do not know from f**king Adam. Take your doubtlessly well intended advice and jack it up your ass. believe me. i know my manners. sometimes there is a bad dog that needs to be put down. it what i do. that dog will know silence and know never to address me or i will make him my personal vindictive project. never question my methods. i am not looking for your approval. believe me i do not need it. Go ahead Jim. Run your mouth. Shake that rapidly developing gizzard for me like a nice boy.
|
|
tullist
Master Craftsman
Posts: 478
|
Post by tullist on Feb 9, 2014 16:09:52 GMT
I very definitely DO NOT need the come uppance from someone I do not know from f**king Adam. Take your doubtlessly well intended advice and jack it up your ass. believe me. i know my manners. sometimes there is a bad dog that needs to be put down. it what i do. that dog will know silence and know never to address me or i will make him my personal vindictive project. never question my methods. i am not looking for your approval. believe me i do not need it. Go ahead Jim. Run your mouth. Shake that rapidly developing gizzard for me like a nice boy. basically i understand one of us is going to have to go. and by current behavioral standards i realize that is likely me, even though i have built up a type of good will over years with the mods. believe me, i ain't looking for any black oak arkansas/moody blues/elp/jethro tull pervert approval. yes. do tell me all about rock and roll. it would appear you have not been properly introduced. until you, or i, am extinguished, make sure not to address me. understand my name to be inferno. and a damned righteous one at that. NEVER ADDRESS ME.
|
|
tullist
Master Craftsman
Posts: 478
|
Post by tullist on Feb 9, 2014 16:13:27 GMT
AND GET BLACK OAK ARKANSAS AND ANY OF YOUR OTHER PEA BRAIN SONGS OF THE MUTANT SOUTH OFF MY GOD DAMN JETHRO TULL PAGE. GET THAT $h1t OUT OF HERE. MY TOLERANCE FOR MORONS IS ZERO
|
|
tullist
Master Craftsman
Posts: 478
|
Post by tullist on Feb 9, 2014 16:57:18 GMT
basically i understand one of us is going to have to go. and by current behavioral standards i realize that is likely me, even though i have built up a type of good will over years with the mods. believe me, i ain't looking for any black oak arkansas/moody blues/elp/jethro tull pervert approval. yes. do tell me all about rock and roll. it would appear you have not been properly introduced. until you, or i, am extinguished, make sure not to address me. understand my name to be inferno. and a damned righteous one at that. NEVER ADDRESS ME. I stop by for the first time in a few months to talk about a new album, and I find a cyber-bully taunting a thread. What the hell has become of Tull fandom? One guy who I thought had more common sense and was a friend at one time is allegedly trolling the other Tull site, and Tullist here is exhibiting a false machismo I haven't seen or heard since I had to beat some guys ass in a Detroit bar in the 1990s. "Oooh, I'm dangerous! I'm crazy! You don't want to mess with me!" Stop it. It is damn silly. No, it's downright embarrassing. We are talking about an album or a band or an individual performer. We are mostly all old bastards. This isn't some frickin' Justin Bieber or Harry Potter site with hormonally-imbalanced teenagers. With that out of the way, I am far more excited about the current Ian Anderson project than I was about TAAB2 (which I thought was substandard Tull but fine as a solo project), and I am glad Ian has dropped the whole "Jethro Tull" pretense on the album cover, which is very strong graphically, and doesn't require an "Ian Anderson of Jethro Tull" sticker to muck up the presentation. The former lives to be recounted (Neolithic wanderer, Iron Age blacksmith, medieval monk, etc.) seem suited for some acoustic sets, which I am hoping for, as there wasn't enough of that on TAAB2. I have always preferred Ian's acoustic to his flute, to be honest. Anyway, hello again everyone. Let's drop the drama. right here with your false machismo there all star. yeah. i know 6 ft 4 whatever. 239 lbs. well 6 foot 3. 200 lbs. and believe. i know how to fight. ain't no false machismo. know who u are addressing. f**k you btw. u may have pulled that in detroit. says u. by all means do try and give me my come uppance in chicago. f**k you.
|
|
tullist
Master Craftsman
Posts: 478
|
Post by tullist on Feb 9, 2014 17:00:24 GMT
I stop by for the first time in a few months to talk about a new album, and I find a cyber-bully taunting a thread. What the hell has become of Tull fandom? One guy who I thought had more common sense and was a friend at one time is allegedly trolling the other Tull site, and Tullist here is exhibiting a false machismo I haven't seen or heard since I had to beat some guys ass in a Detroit bar in the 1990s. "Oooh, I'm dangerous! I'm crazy! You don't want to mess with me!" Stop it. It is damn silly. No, it's downright embarrassing. We are talking about an album or a band or an individual performer. We are mostly all old bastards. This isn't some frickin' Justin Bieber or Harry Potter site with hormonally-imbalanced teenagers. With that out of the way, I am far more excited about the current Ian Anderson project than I was about TAAB2 (which I thought was substandard Tull but fine as a solo project), and I am glad Ian has dropped the whole "Jethro Tull" pretense on the album cover, which is very strong graphically, and doesn't require an "Ian Anderson of Jethro Tull" sticker to muck up the presentation. The former lives to be recounted (Neolithic wanderer, Iron Age blacksmith, medieval monk, etc.) seem suited for some acoustic sets, which I am hoping for, as there wasn't enough of that on TAAB2. I have always preferred Ian's acoustic to his flute, to be honest. Anyway, hello again everyone. Let's drop the drama. right here with your false machismo there all star. yeah. i know 6 ft 4 whatever. 239 lbs. well 6 foot 3. 200 lbs. and believe. i know how to fight. ain't no false machismo. know who u are addressing. f**k you btw. u may have pulled that in detroit. says u. by all means do try and give me my come uppance in chicago. f**k you. and while you're at it, do extol the virtues of a moody blues recording to me. yes they were a wondrous and mysterious thing. prog geek with a hard on. f**k you.
|
|
tullist
Master Craftsman
Posts: 478
|
Post by tullist on Feb 9, 2014 17:15:04 GMT
Precisely, Morthoron, those who wish to convert their lack of self-control to text need apply elsewhere. As for hopes for H.E., I like your ideas there. Personally, I'm up for surprises and also get the sense that this new project is going to be worth a few more high fives in the studio than TAAB2. The character list ideas suggest lots of richly detailed acoustic work, as presented by a band in 2014 with all the extras. in a nutshell, f**k you. but kudos for constructing a sentence that does not read like a line from the passion play
|
|
tullist
Master Craftsman
Posts: 478
|
Post by tullist on Feb 9, 2014 17:17:46 GMT
I stop by for the first time in a few months to talk about a new album, and I find a cyber-bully taunting a thread. What the hell has become of Tull fandom? One guy who I thought had more common sense and was a friend at one time is allegedly trolling the other Tull site, and Tullist here is exhibiting a false machismo I haven't seen or heard since I had to beat some guys ass in a Detroit bar in the 1990s. "Oooh, I'm dangerous! I'm crazy! You don't want to mess with me!" Stop it. It is damn silly. No, it's downright embarrassing. We are talking about an album or a band or an individual performer. We are mostly all old bastards. This isn't some frickin' Justin Bieber or Harry Potter site with hormonally-imbalanced teenagers. With that out of the way, I am far more excited about the current Ian Anderson project than I was about TAAB2 (which I thought was substandard Tull but fine as a solo project), and I am glad Ian has dropped the whole "Jethro Tull" pretense on the album cover, which is very strong graphically, and doesn't require an "Ian Anderson of Jethro Tull" sticker to muck up the presentation. The former lives to be recounted (Neolithic wanderer, Iron Age blacksmith, medieval monk, etc.) seem suited for some acoustic sets, which I am hoping for, as there wasn't enough of that on TAAB2. I have always preferred Ian's acoustic to his flute, to be honest. Anyway, hello again everyone. Let's drop the drama. right here with your false machismo there all star. yeah. i know 6 ft 4 whatever. 239 lbs. well 6 foot 3. 200 lbs. and believe. i know how to fight. ain't no false machismo. know who u are addressing. f**k you btw. u may have pulled that in detroit. says u. by all means do try and give me my come uppance in chicago. f**k you. in fact in that u operate between both worlds, largely the other one, likely u are one of the $h1t stirrers come here to view your handiwork first hand. have we been introduced? f**kyou
|
|
|
Post by maddogfagin on Feb 9, 2014 17:26:49 GMT
OK Ray, you've had your rant and now it's time to call a halt. I'm admin of this Tull site to host somewhere where we can talk Tull and not spit venom at all and sundry.
So I'll ask you, and anyone else who thinks that this is a mature way to go about things, to finish it now and to shut up or else I'll have to go down the road of suspensions, something I don't want to do.
Finally, I'm not going to delete any of the posts made under the Homo Erraticus thread so that they can be seen by other for what they are.
|
|
tullist
Master Craftsman
Posts: 478
|
Post by tullist on Feb 9, 2014 17:31:00 GMT
OK Ray, you've had your rant and now it's time to call a halt. I'm admin of this Tull site to host somewhere where we can talk Tull and not spit venom at all and sundry.
So I'll ask you, and anyone else who thinks that this is a mature way to go about things, to finish it now and to shut up or else I'll have to go down the road of suspensions, something I don't want to do.
Finally, I'm not going to delete any of the posts made under the Homo Erraticus thread so that they can be seen by other for what they are. respect to Graham, Patti and Bernie. I may well need to be removed. I intend to respond to anyone who feels the need to get the last word in on me or make an uninformed character judgement.
|
|
|
Post by morthoron on Feb 9, 2014 17:36:41 GMT
right here with your false machismo there all star. yeah. i know 6 ft 4 whatever. 239 lbs. well 6 foot 3. 200 lbs. and believe. i know how to fight. ain't no false machismo. know who u are addressing. f**k you btw. u may have pulled that in detroit. says u. by all means do try and give me my come uppance in chicago. f**k you. and while you're at it, do extol the virtues of a moody blues recording to me. yes they were a wondrous and mysterious thing. prog geek with a hard on. f**k you. Oh, you are funny, little man. I do enjoy your inability to type whole words. I suppose it is difficult for you to type complete words and sentences with your head up your posterior: hunt and peck, take a breath, hunt and peck. Can you afford to come to Detroit? I mean, I am not sure you can afford the cost of gas working as a 7-11 cashier, so I don't want you to feel self-conscious (particularly with your undiagnosed anger management issues). As far as who I am addressing, until you start typing and reasoning like an adult, I will continue to speak to you as I would a rude little child. Grow up, junior. Life is too short to hold such rage on the Internet. By the way, I do enjoy The Moody Blues. Quite relaxing. Days of Future Past was a great album in 1967. What exactly do you have against them? And what is it you listen to, exactly? I find it rare for someone to comment on a Jethro Tull board that has such a myopic sense of music. EDIT: My apologies, Maddogfagin, our posts crossed while I was typing. I won't continue this lunacy. If you'd lilke you can delete this post.
|
|
|
Post by maddogfagin on Feb 9, 2014 17:47:49 GMT
OK Ray, you've had your rant and now it's time to call a halt. I'm admin of this Tull site to host somewhere where we can talk Tull and not spit venom at all and sundry.
So I'll ask you, and anyone else who thinks that this is a mature way to go about things, to finish it now and to shut up or else I'll have to go down the road of suspensions, something I don't want to do.
Finally, I'm not going to delete any of the posts made under the Homo Erraticus thread so that they can be seen by others for what they are. respect to Graham, Patti and Bernie. I may well need to be removed. I intend to respond to anyone who feels the need to get the last word in on me or make an uninformed character judgement. Ray You are just playing into the hands of those who have tried and failed to disrupt this Forum and you have been blinded to the fact that it's not the people here who you should be ranting about. This is why they did it - to annoy and piss off people here which in your case they have obviously succeeded. Sit back, take a deep breath, and you'll realise what's happened. Everyone else here has recognised the bored's "game" for what it is and is happy to let them get it out of their system.
|
|
|
Post by morthoron on Feb 9, 2014 17:58:11 GMT
respect to Graham, Patti and Bernie. I may well need to be removed. I intend to respond to anyone who feels the need to get the last word in on me or make an uninformed character judgement. Ray You are just playing into the hands of those who have tried and failed to disrupt this Forum and you have been blinded to the fact that it's not the people here who you should be ranting about. This is why they did it - to annoy and piss off people here which in your case they have obviously succeeded. Sit back, take a deep breath, and you'll realise what's happened. Everyone else here has recognised the bored's "game" for what it is and is happy to let them get it out of their system. I hope you weren't referring to me playing some kind of "bored's game". I haven't posted here much, but I have not stirred up anything in the past. Please review my posts. I just don't think this Tullist fellow should be allowed to talk to people in that manner. In fact, I posted this on the other site recently: "Ummm...but anyway, I am honestly saddened there is such a ridiculous rift between Tull fans. That there are two separate boards/fora seems so odd. Yes, yes, I am aware of the historical baggage that caused the separation; nevertheless, isn't it bad enough that I have to hear bull$h1t from the media and read comments from ass-hat, knuckle-dragging Neanderthals on the Internet that loathe Tull -- and Tull fans are at each other's throats as well?" I have no "skin" in this game. I like to discuss music, and Tull is a favorite. But, if you'd like, please delete my account immediately. I don't want to post anywhere I am not welcome.
|
|
|
Post by maddogfagin on Feb 9, 2014 17:59:14 GMT
and while you're at it, do extol the virtues of a moody blues recording to me. yes they were a wondrous and mysterious thing. prog geek with a hard on. f**k you. Oh, you are funny, little man. I do enjoy your inability to type whole words. I suppose it is difficult for you to type complete words and sentences with your head up your posterior: hunt and peck, take a breath, hunt and peck. Can you afford to come to Detroit? I mean, I am not sure you can afford the cost of gas working as a 7-11 cashier, so I don't want you to feel self-conscious (particularly with your undiagnosed anger management issues). As far as who I am addressing, until you start typing and reasoning like an adult, I will continue to speak to you as I would a rude little child. Grow up, junior. Life is too short to hold such rage on the Internet. By the way, I do enjoy The Moody Blues. Quite relaxing. Days of Future Past was a great album in 1967. What exactly do you have against them? And what is it you listen to, exactly? I find it rare for someone to comment on a Jethro Tull board that has such a myopic sense of music. EDIT: My apologies, Maddogfagin, our posts crossed while I was typing. I won't continue this lunacy. If you'd lilke you can delete this post. I have no intention of deleting this post as I want people to realise, in the long run, that a perfectly good thread has been hijacked into something else. It may well be that when I get a spare hour or two I will move all the "ranting" threads which have been posted here over the last 24 hours into a thread of their own. Donations of coffee are welcome as well as suggestions for a thread title where we can put the HE ranting.
|
|
tullist
Master Craftsman
Posts: 478
|
Post by tullist on Feb 9, 2014 18:03:45 GMT
and while you're at it, do extol the virtues of a moody blues recording to me. yes they were a wondrous and mysterious thing. prog geek with a hard on. f**k you. Oh, you are funny, little man. I do enjoy your inability to type whole words. I suppose it is difficult for you to type complete words and sentences with your head up your posterior: hunt and peck, take a breath, hunt and peck. Can you afford to come to Detroit? I mean, I am not sure you can afford the cost of gas working as a 7-11 cashier, so I don't want you to feel self-conscious (particularly with your undiagnosed anger management issues). As far as who I am addressing, until you start typing and reasoning like an adult, I will continue to speak to you as I would a rude little child. Grow up, junior. Life is too short to hold such rage on the Internet. By the way, I do enjoy The Moody Blues. Quite relaxing. Days of Future Past was a great album in 1967. What exactly do you have against them? And what is it you listen to, exactly? I find it rare for someone to comment on a Jethro Tull board that has such a myopic sense of music. EDIT: My apologies, Maddogfagin, our posts crossed while I was typing. I won't continue this lunacy. If you'd lilke you can delete this post. pretty sure the essence of my message is not being conveyed properly to you. that is of course f**k you.
|
|
|
Post by nonrabbit on Feb 9, 2014 18:05:42 GMT
OK Ray, you've had your rant and now it's time to call a halt. I'm admin of this Tull site to host somewhere where we can talk Tull and not spit venom at all and sundry.
So I'll ask you, and anyone else who thinks that this is a mature way to go about things, to finish it now and to shut up or else I'll have to go down the road of suspensions, something I don't want to do.
Finally, I'm not going to delete any of the posts made under the Homo Erraticus thread so that they can be seen by other for what they are. and I'll add to that Ray I'm really confused - I first of all thought that your account had been hacked. I know things can get heated on any subject by anyone at some point but to start posting personal comments to any member is against the rules and can't and won't be tolerated. If you have a personal gripe or if something else has happened on PM's or elsewhere (not that I'm aware of anything via here) then it should be dealt with privately. No member or viewer wants to view this. You say respect for myself and Graham but I would like to see respect for the Forum something that we've all worked at and enjoyed for a long time and will continue to do so. I know that you have enjoyed being a part of it. I reiterate what Graham says if this continues as a mod I will also take the action of suspension. I'm still confused.
|
|
|
Post by nonrabbit on Feb 9, 2014 18:13:02 GMT
Hello Morthoron Welcome Back You've picked a good time I hope you continue to post and I look forward to your contributions. Unfortunately it goes with any web chat territory, I'm sure your aware of it when things can get rather heated. Changing the subject. What's your take on the new album - are storm clouds brewing - is he going to surprise us?
|
|
|
Post by maddogfagin on Feb 9, 2014 18:23:34 GMT
Ray You are just playing into the hands of those who have tried and failed to disrupt this Forum and you have been blinded to the fact that it's not the people here who you should be ranting about. This is why they did it - to annoy and piss off people here which in your case they have obviously succeeded. Sit back, take a deep breath, and you'll realise what's happened. Everyone else here has recognised the bored's "game" for what it is and is happy to let them get it out of their system. I hope you weren't referring to me playing some kind of "bored's game". I haven't posted here much, but I have not stirred up anything in the past. Please review my posts. I just don't think this Tullist fellow should be allowed to talk to people in that manner. In fact, I posted this on the other site recently: "Ummm...but anyway, I am honestly saddened there is such a ridiculous rift between Tull fans. That there are two separate boards/fora seems so odd. Yes, yes, I am aware of the historical baggage that caused the separation; nevertheless, isn't it bad enough that I have to hear bull$h1t from the media and read comments from ass-hat, knuckle-dragging Neanderthals on the Internet that loathe Tull -- and Tull fans are at each other's throats as well?" I have no "skin" in this game. I like to discuss music, and Tull is a favorite. But, if you'd like, please delete my account immediately. I don't want to post anywhere I am not welcome. You're more than welcome here morthoron as are all Tull fans. Yes, I wish I could discuss music, whether it's Tull or any other artist but with this current affair going on I don't seem to have the time. As for Tullist, and for that fact anyone else who thinks it funny to mess up the Forum, he has been warned that any more of his "ranting" and he will be suspended.
|
|
|
Post by futureshock on Feb 9, 2014 18:26:26 GMT
Ray You are just playing into the hands of those who have tried and failed to disrupt this Forum and you have been blinded to the fact that it's not the people here who you should be ranting about. This is why they did it - to annoy and piss off people here which in your case they have obviously succeeded. Sit back, take a deep breath, and you'll realise what's happened. Everyone else here has recognised the bored's "game" for what it is and is happy to let them get it out of their system. I hope you weren't referring to me playing some kind of "bored's game". I haven't posted here much, but I have not stirred up anything in the past. Please review my posts. I just don't think this Tullist fellow should be allowed to talk to people in that manner. In fact, I posted this on the other site recently: "Ummm...but anyway, I am honestly saddened there is such a ridiculous rift between Tull fans. That there are two separate boards/fora seems so odd. Yes, yes, I am aware of the historical baggage that caused the separation; nevertheless, isn't it bad enough that I have to hear bull$h1t from the media and read comments from ass-hat, knuckle-dragging Neanderthals on the Internet that loathe Tull -- and Tull fans are at each other's throats as well?" I have no "skin" in this game. I like to discuss music, and Tull is a favorite. But, if you'd like, please delete my account immediately. I don't want to post anywhere I am not welcome. Morthoron, nothing out of tullist is relevant or in the least bit typical of this website. Don't feel targeted. People chat here endlessly and there's lots of diversity and good humour. Why there is so much tolerance of that one personality on any website, is beyond me.
|
|
|
Post by nonrabbit on Feb 9, 2014 18:28:56 GMT
I hope you weren't referring to me playing some kind of "bored's game". I haven't posted here much, but I have not stirred up anything in the past. Please review my posts. I just don't think this Tullist fellow should be allowed to talk to people in that manner. In fact, I posted this on the other site recently: "Ummm...but anyway, I am honestly saddened there is such a ridiculous rift between Tull fans. That there are two separate boards/fora seems so odd. Yes, yes, I am aware of the historical baggage that caused the separation; nevertheless, isn't it bad enough that I have to hear bull$h1t from the media and read comments from ass-hat, knuckle-dragging Neanderthals on the Internet that loathe Tull -- and Tull fans are at each other's throats as well?" I have no "skin" in this game. I like to discuss music, and Tull is a favorite. But, if you'd like, please delete my account immediately. I don't want to post anywhere I am not welcome. Morthoron, nothing out of tullist is relevant or in the least bit typical of this website. Don't feel targeted by whatever is going on in that poor loser's skull. People chat here endlessly and there's lots of diversity and good humour. Why there is so much tolerance of that one dedicated, toxic personality on any website, is beyond me. Futurshock I agree and I would agree totally if you would delete the personal attack.
|
|
|
Post by morthoron on Feb 9, 2014 18:29:00 GMT
Hello Morthoron Welcome Back You've picked a good time I hope you continue to post and I look forward to your contributions. Unfortunately it goes with any web chat territory, I'm sure your aware of it when things can get rather heated. Changing the subject. What's your take on the new album - are storm clouds brewing - is he going to surprise us? Thanks, NR. As I said in the previous post, I really like the cover of HE, it sort of looks like Aqualung in the Apocalypse. And I like the concept (although I am hoping for more acoustic guitar than on TAAB2). Of course, Ian throws in a bit of Pythonesque witticism, naming his subject Ernest T. Parritt (any relation to Colonel Archibald Parritt?). Now this Parritt is dead. A non-living Parritt, as it were. Intriguing. And I am glad Gerald Bostock has gone back to lyric writing (and about someone else). His life story was not worth a revisit in TAAB2.
|
|
|
Post by nonrabbit on Feb 9, 2014 18:37:10 GMT
Hello Morthoron Welcome Back You've picked a good time I hope you continue to post and I look forward to your contributions. Unfortunately it goes with any web chat territory, I'm sure your aware of it when things can get rather heated. Changing the subject. What's your take on the new album - are storm clouds brewing - is he going to surprise us? Thanks, NR. As I said in the previous post, I really like the cover of HE, it sort of looks like Aqualung in the Apocalypse. And I like the concept (although I am hoping for more acoustic guitar than on TAAB2). Of course, Ian throws in a bit of Pythonesque witticism, naming his subject Ernest T. Parritt (any relation to Colonel Archibald Parritt?). Now this Parritt is dead. A non-living Parritt, as it were. Intriguing. And I am glad Gerald Bostock has gone back to lyric writing (and about someone else). His life story was not worth a revisit in TAAB2. I like the album cover as well at first I thought it was a bit OTT but it's not - he can carry it off - I think There is a bit of similarity in the subject of different life stories etc to TAAB2 so I hope the contents of the stories are a step up from TAAB2 in terms of imagination and dare I say- wow factor. I am really looking forward to the music.
|
|